Navigating the New Regulatory Landscape: A Deep Dive into Summer 2025's Cosmetic Industry Shifts

Key Highlights:
Introduction
Modernizing OTC and Sunscreen Regulations: The OTC Reform Bill
The Push for Purer Products: The Safer Beauty Bill Package
Biodiversity Compliance and Sustainable Sourcing: A Growing Imperative
International Trade Dynamics: The US-EU Tariff Agreement
Navigating the Digital Marketplace: Scrutiny on Influencer Marketing
Vegan Collagen Claims: The Importance of Substantiation
Inclusive Beauty: Mandating Textured Hair Training in Cosmetology Schools
'Made in USA' Claims: Heightened FTC Scrutiny
Packaging Waste and Recycling: Preparing for California's SB 54
Looking Ahead: A Future of Responsible Beauty

Key Highlights:

The Senate's approval of the OTC Reform Bill signals a modernized approach to sunscreen and OTC product regulation, aiming for streamlined approvals and enhanced safety.
New legislative initiatives, particularly the 'Safer Beauty Bill Package,' target toxic chemicals and demand greater transparency in cosmetic ingredients, reflecting a broader consumer and legislative push for product safety.
Heightened scrutiny on marketing claims, from 'Made in USA' labels to influencer disclosures and vegan product substantiation, emphasizes the critical need for rigorous verification and accurate consumer communication.

Introduction

The summer of 2025 has ushered in a period of unprecedented regulatory and legal transformation for the cosmetics and personal care industry. From the halls of the U.S. Senate to state legislative bodies and global trade discussions, a complex web of new rules, proposed bills, and intensified enforcement actions is reshaping how products are formulated, marketed, and sold. Companies are now contending with a compliance landscape that demands not only adherence to established norms but also proactive engagement with emerging standards related to ingredient safety, environmental sustainability, ethical sourcing, and marketing integrity. This period is characterized by a concerted effort to enhance consumer protection, promote environmental stewardship, and foster greater transparency across the entire product lifecycle. Navigating these shifts successfully requires a sophisticated understanding of legal nuances, a commitment to sustainable practices, and a vigilant approach to every aspect of brand communication.

Modernizing OTC and Sunscreen Regulations: The OTC Reform Bill

A significant development on the federal level is the Senate Committee's approval of the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Reform Bill. This legislative step marks a crucial moment for the regulation of OTC products, particularly sunscreens, which have long faced a cumbersome and often outdated approval process. The bill's passage through the committee signals a commitment to streamlining the pathway for new OTC drug approvals, potentially accelerating the introduction of innovative and effective products to the market.

For sunscreens, the implications are particularly profound. Previously, sunscreens were categorized as OTC drugs, subjecting new active ingredients to a lengthy and expensive New Drug Application (NDA) process. This often deterred innovation, leading to a limited palette of FDA-approved sunscreen active ingredients in the U.S. compared to other global markets. The new reform aims to transition to a more agile monograph system, similar to how other common OTC drugs are regulated. This change could mean faster review times for new ingredients and formulations, potentially bringing a wider array of advanced UV filters and more cosmetically elegant sunscreen products to consumers sooner.

Industry stakeholders have largely expressed cautious optimism regarding these changes. The Personal Care Products Council (PCPC), a leading trade association, has long advocated for a more efficient regulatory framework for sunscreens, recognizing the public health importance of broad access to effective UV protection. While the precise details of implementation will shape the ultimate impact, the general consensus is that a modernized system could foster innovation and enhance product safety standards by allowing the FDA to more rapidly review and approve ingredients based on contemporary scientific understanding. This shift is not merely about market access; it's about evolving regulatory frameworks to match the pace of scientific discovery and consumer needs, ensuring that sun protection remains at the forefront of public health initiatives with the best available science and technology.

The Push for Purer Products: The Safer Beauty Bill Package

Complementing federal efforts, a robust movement at the state and federal level aims to eliminate hazardous chemicals from cosmetic products through the 'Safer Beauty Bill Package.' This comprehensive legislative initiative comprises four distinct pieces of legislation, each targeting a specific facet of product safety and transparency. The package collectively proposes stricter regulations designed to safeguard consumer health by mandating ingredient disclosures, enacting outright bans on certain hazardous chemicals, and imposing more stringent transparency requirements throughout the supply chain. Furthermore, a critical component of this legislative push involves the allocation of funds for scientific research into cosmetic ingredients, underscoring a commitment to evidence-based policy-making.

The momentum behind this package reflects a growing consumer demand for "cleaner" beauty products and a broader legislative recognition of the potential health risks associated with exposure to certain chemicals found in cosmetics. Ingredients such as phthalates, parabens, formaldehydes, and certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have become focal points of concern due to their association with various health issues. This legislation seeks to codify restrictions or outright bans on these and other chemicals, moving the U.S. closer to regulatory frameworks already established in the European Union, which has historically maintained a more precautionary approach to cosmetic ingredient safety.

For cosmetic manufacturers, the 'Safer Beauty Bill Package' presents both challenges and opportunities. Compliance will necessitate significant reformulation efforts for products containing targeted chemicals, alongside investments in supply chain mapping to ensure full ingredient transparency. This could mean a substantial overhaul for some legacy products and an intensified focus on ingredient screening for new formulations. However, it also offers an opportunity for brands to reinforce their commitment to consumer safety, build greater trust, and differentiate themselves in a crowded market by proactively embracing more stringent safety standards. The legislative drive signals a new era where "clean beauty" is not just a marketing term but a regulatory imperative, pushing the industry towards a more responsible and health-conscious future.

Biodiversity Compliance and Sustainable Sourcing: A Growing Imperative

Beyond product formulation, the cosmetics industry is increasingly grappling with its environmental footprint, particularly concerning biodiversity. A recent webinar hosted by the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) underscored the complex challenges companies face in meeting evolving biodiversity compliance standards. The discussion highlighted the critical importance of sustainable sourcing practices and radical transparency within the supply chain.

The extraction of natural ingredients, ranging from rare botanical extracts to essential oils and minerals, can have significant environmental consequences, including deforestation, habitat destruction, and the exploitation of local communities. As global awareness of climate change and biodiversity loss intensifies, regulators, consumers, and non-governmental organizations are exerting pressure on brands to ensure their raw materials are sourced responsibly. This includes adhering to principles of fair trade, respecting intellectual property rights of indigenous communities, and minimizing ecological disruption.

Jonathan Hicks, PCPC Director of International Trade and Regulatory Affairs, emphasized that compliance in this area extends beyond simply avoiding endangered species. It involves a holistic approach to supply chain management, demanding rigorous due diligence to trace ingredients back to their origin. Companies must verify that their suppliers are employing sustainable harvesting methods, contributing to the conservation of biodiversity, and providing equitable benefits to local populations. This requires robust traceability systems, credible certifications, and ongoing engagement with suppliers to foster sustainable practices.

For the cosmetics industry, this translates into a need for greater investment in sustainable agriculture, responsible wild harvesting initiatives, and the development of synthetic alternatives that can reduce pressure on natural resources. Brands that proactively embrace biodiversity compliance not only mitigate legal and reputational risks but also appeal to a growing segment of environmentally conscious consumers, positioning themselves as leaders in ethical and sustainable beauty. The conversation at the PCPC webinar made it clear: sustainable sourcing is no longer an optional add-on but a foundational element of responsible business practice.

International Trade Dynamics: The US-EU Tariff Agreement

Global trade agreements continue to shape the financial landscape for the cosmetics industry. The recent US-EU tariff agreement has significant implications for European cosmetics exporters, potentially easing trade barriers and reducing costs. For years, various tariff and non-tariff barriers have complicated the transatlantic trade of beauty products, impacting competitiveness and consumer prices.

While the agreement promises a reduction in direct costs for European manufacturers looking to penetrate the U.S. market, industry experts caution that the benefits are not solely defined by tariffs. Regulatory alignment and ongoing compliance issues remain paramount factors influencing market access. The U.S. and EU maintain distinct regulatory frameworks for cosmetics, encompassing everything from ingredient restrictions and labeling requirements to product testing protocols. These differences can create substantial hurdles for companies attempting to operate in both markets. For instance, an ingredient banned in the EU might be permitted in the U.S., and vice-versa, necessitating different formulations or labeling for each region.

Furthermore, issues such as customs procedures, intellectual property protections, and evolving sustainability standards can still pose significant challenges, even with reduced tariffs. European companies must continue to invest in understanding and adhering to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, state-specific requirements (like California's Proposition 65), and federal trade commission guidelines. Conversely, U.S. companies exporting to Europe must navigate the comprehensive Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, which governs the EU market.

The tariff agreement, therefore, represents a positive step towards economic cooperation, but it does not eliminate the complex regulatory mosaic that characterizes international trade in cosmetics. Companies must adopt a comprehensive strategy that addresses both economic incentives and regulatory harmonization to truly capitalize on cross-border opportunities. The deal may lower the financial entry barrier, but regulatory agility and deep market understanding remain essential for success.

Navigating the Digital Marketplace: Scrutiny on Influencer Marketing

The proliferation of digital platforms and influencer marketing has opened new avenues for cosmetic brands to reach consumers, but it has also attracted heightened regulatory scrutiny. The case of personal care brand Dr. Squatch illustrates the growing focus on transparency in influencer partnerships. Dr. Squatch ceased certain TikTok Shop affiliate promotions in response to a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge over affiliate marketing disclosures.

This incident highlights a broader trend: regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are intensifying their oversight of how brands and influencers communicate endorsements. The FTC's Endorsement Guides require that if there is a "material connection" between an endorser and an advertiser—a relationship that might affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement—that connection must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed. This includes financial arrangements, free products, or any other form of compensation.

Jennifer Adams, an attorney specializing in advertising law, notes that the Dr. Squatch case underscores the evolving regulatory landscape where casual, organic-seeming endorsements on platforms like TikTok are no longer immune to scrutiny. The "Fast-Track SWIFT" program, used in this instance, is designed for expedited review of deceptive advertising claims, signaling regulators' intent to quickly address perceived violations.

For cosmetics brands, this means re-evaluating their entire influencer marketing strategy. They must ensure that all paid partnerships include clear, unambiguous disclosures prominently placed within the content, whether it's a video, image, or text post. This might involve using hashtags like #ad, #sponsored, or #paidpartnership, placed visibly at the beginning of a caption or verbally stated early in a video. Furthermore, brands are increasingly held responsible for ensuring their influencers comply with these disclosure requirements, necessitating robust contracts and monitoring systems. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties, including fines, injunctions, and reputational damage. The Dr. Squatch case serves as a stark reminder that authenticity and transparency are paramount in the digital age, and brands must prioritize ethical marketing practices to maintain consumer trust and avoid regulatory pitfalls.

Vegan Collagen Claims: The Importance of Substantiation

As consumer demand for plant-based and "clean" beauty products grows, so does the scrutiny on marketing claims associated with these categories. Recent court decisions have clarified the legal boundaries for marketing vegan collagen products, highlighting the significant risks associated with misleading claims and emphasizing the critical need for clear and substantiated labeling.

Collagen, traditionally derived from animal sources, has long been a popular ingredient in skincare for its purported benefits in promoting skin elasticity and firmness. The advent of "vegan collagen" products—often formulated with plant-based ingredients that mimic the effects of collagen or stimulate the body's natural collagen production—has created a new marketing frontier. However, the term "vegan collagen" itself can be ambiguous, as true collagen is an animal protein. Products marketed as such often contain ingredients like plant proteins, peptides, and antioxidants that support collagen synthesis or offer similar benefits, but they are not animal-derived collagen itself.

Shawn Collins, a partner at Stradling Law, highlights that these legal actions stem from consumer protection laws designed to prevent false or misleading advertising. Brands risk litigation if their claims about "vegan collagen" imply the product contains actual animal-derived collagen or if they exaggerate the product's benefits without sufficient scientific evidence. The rulings underscore that while consumers are seeking plant-based alternatives, they also expect accuracy in product descriptions.

To mitigate potential litigation, stakeholders must adopt rigorous substantiation practices. This involves:

Clear Labeling: Explicitly stating that the product contains plant-based ingredients that support collagen, rather than implying it contains animal-derived collagen. For example, terms like "collagen-boosting" or "collagen-supporting" are generally safer than "vegan collagen" without further qualification.
Scientific Evidence: Backing up all efficacy claims with robust, peer-reviewed scientific studies. If a product claims to increase skin elasticity, it must have data to support it.
Transparency in Ingredients: Providing a comprehensive list of all ingredients and their specific functions, avoiding ambiguous terminology.

The legal landscape is evolving to ensure that brands do not capitalize on consumer trends through deceptive language. For the beauty industry, this means a renewed focus on scientific integrity in marketing and a commitment to educating consumers rather than potentially misleading them with imprecise terminology.

Inclusive Beauty: Mandating Textured Hair Training in Cosmetology Schools

A significant stride towards inclusivity and specialized education within the beauty industry is the recent legislation in Washington, Vermont, and Maine, which will now require cosmetology programs to include comprehensive training on textured hair. This move reflects a broader societal push for greater representation and competency in serving diverse consumer needs.

For decades, standard cosmetology curricula have often disproportionately focused on straight hair types, leaving many beauty professionals unprepared to properly care for and style textured hair—including wavy, curly, coily, and kinky hair patterns. This gap in education has resulted in widespread challenges for individuals with textured hair, who often struggle to find stylists with the expertise to meet their unique needs, leading to frustration, damage, and feelings of exclusion within the beauty space.

The new legislation aims to rectify this historical imbalance by mandating that cosmetology schools integrate specific modules on textured hair care, cutting, styling, and chemical treatments. This includes understanding different curl patterns, porosity levels, hydration needs, and protective styling techniques specific to textured hair.

These efforts have garnered strong support from key industry organizations, including the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC), the Professional Beauty Association (PBA), and the Texture Education Collective. Their advocacy underscores the industry's recognition that true inclusivity requires foundational changes in education and training. By equipping future cosmetologists with the skills to confidently and competently work with all hair types, these legislative mandates will not only elevate professional standards but also foster a more inclusive and accessible beauty industry for all consumers. This represents a pivotal moment where legislative action is directly addressing a long-standing need for equity and expertise in professional beauty services.

'Made in USA' Claims: Heightened FTC Scrutiny

In July, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) significantly intensified its enforcement actions concerning 'Made in USA' claims, signaling to brands the critical necessity of rigorous substantiation and accurate labeling practices. This heightened scrutiny is particularly salient during summer months when many brands lean into patriotic advertising, potentially leading to overstatements regarding the U.S. origin of their products.

The FTC's 'Made in USA' standard requires that for a product to be advertised as "Made in USA," "Proudly American," or similar, "all or virtually all" of the product must be made in the United States. This means that all significant parts and processing that go into the product must be of U.S. origin. Assembly in the U.S. is not sufficient if components are primarily sourced from abroad. This standard is designed to prevent consumer deception and ensure fair competition.

Julia Solomon Ensor, former FTC "Made in USA" program manager, has strongly cautioned cosmetics and personal care products companies to exercise extreme prudence. Brands often face challenges in verifying the origin of every component, especially within complex global supply chains. A seemingly minor ingredient, a specific type of packaging, or even a processing step undertaken outside the U.S. could invalidate a broad "Made in USA" claim.

The FTC's enforcement actions can range from warning letters to significant civil penalties and requirements for brands to issue corrective advertising. For example, a brand might claim its shampoo is "Made in USA" because it's formulated and bottled domestically, but if key ingredients like a unique botanical extract or a synthetic compound are manufactured overseas, the claim could be challenged.

To comply, companies must conduct thorough due diligence on their entire supply chain, documenting the origin of all materials and processing steps. They should be prepared to provide evidence that "all or virtually all" of the product is U.S.-sourced. If a product contains foreign components, brands can use qualified claims such as "Made in USA with imported parts" or "Assembled in USA." The increased FTC scrutiny serves as a clear reminder that marketing claims, particularly those appealing to patriotism, must be scrupulously accurate and defensible.

Packaging Waste and Recycling: Preparing for California's SB 54

California's Senate Bill 54 (SB 54), the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, is rapidly approaching its effective date, posing a significant challenge and opportunity for the beauty industry. This landmark legislation aims to drastically reduce packaging waste, particularly plastics, and boost recycling rates across the state.

SB 54 mandates that all packaging in California be recyclable or compostable by 2032, and it establishes aggressive targets for plastic pollution reduction. Specifically, it requires a 25% reduction in plastic packaging by 2032 and demands that 65% of all single-use plastic packaging be recyclable by the same year. A key component of the bill is the shift towards Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), meaning producers (brands) are now responsible for the lifecycle of their packaging, including its end-of-life management. This includes funding collection and recycling infrastructure.

For the beauty industry, which heavily relies on diverse and often complex packaging—from elaborate glass jars and plastic bottles to multi-material components and intricate closures—SB 54 necessitates a comprehensive re-evaluation of current packaging strategies. Compliance will require:

Redesigning Packaging: Shifting away from hard-to-recycle plastics and multi-material packaging towards mono-material designs, post-consumer recycled (PCR) content, and truly compostable alternatives.
Investing in Infrastructure: Contributing to the statewide recycling infrastructure through a producer responsibility organization (PRO). This will likely involve fees based on the volume and type of packaging put onto the market.
Supply Chain Overhaul: Working closely with packaging suppliers to source compliant materials and ensure design for recyclability.
Consumer Education: Providing clear labeling and instructions to consumers on how to properly dispose of and recycle packaging.

A spokesperson from the Circular Action Alliance, a non-profit organization focused on building a circular economy, highlighted the urgency for industry stakeholders to prepare. The beauty sector's ability to innovate in sustainable packaging will be crucial for compliance and for maintaining a competitive edge. Brands that proactively invest in sustainable packaging solutions will not only meet regulatory mandates but also align with growing consumer preference for environmentally responsible products, demonstrating leadership in addressing the global plastic waste crisis.

Looking Ahead: A Future of Responsible Beauty

The confluence of these regulatory and legal developments points to a clear trajectory for the cosmetics industry: a future defined by heightened accountability, transparency, and sustainability. The days of opaque supply chains, ambiguous claims, and minimal environmental consideration are rapidly receding. Instead, companies are being pushed towards a holistic approach that integrates consumer safety, environmental stewardship, and ethical sourcing into the very fabric of their business models.

The modernization of OTC regulations, the aggressive pursuit of safer chemical profiles, the mandates for biodiversity compliance, and the strict enforcement of marketing claims collectively signal a paradigm shift. This shift is not merely about avoiding penalties; it's about building long-term brand equity based on trust, authenticity, and a genuine commitment to responsible practices. Brands that embrace these changes proactively will be best positioned to thrive in this evolving landscape. They will be the ones that invest in research and development for sustainable ingredients, redesign packaging for circularity, educate consumers on responsible consumption, and meticulously verify every claim made on their products. The summer of 2025 marks a pivotal moment, setting the stage for a beauty industry that is not only innovative and appealing but also fundamentally safer, more ethical, and more sustainable.

FAQ

Q1: What are the primary goals of the OTC Reform Bill for sunscreens? A1: The OTC Reform Bill aims to modernize and streamline the approval process for sunscreens and other over-the-counter drugs. Its primary goals include accelerating the review and approval of new active ingredients for sunscreens, facilitating faster market entry for innovative products, and ultimately enhancing product safety standards through a more efficient regulatory framework, moving away from the cumbersome New Drug Application (NDA) process towards a more agile monograph system.

Q2: What is the 'Safer Beauty Bill Package' and what chemicals does it target? A2: The 'Safer Beauty Bill Package' is a comprehensive legislative initiative comprising four bills designed to enhance consumer safety in cosmetics. It proposes stricter regulations on ingredient disclosures, bans certain hazardous chemicals (such as phthalates, parabens, formaldehydes, and certain PFAS), mandates greater transparency, and allocates funds for research into cosmetic ingredients. The package targets chemicals known or suspected to be harmful to human health, aligning U.S. standards more closely with stricter international regulations.

Q3: How does the new US-EU tariff deal impact the European cosmetics industry? A3: The new US-EU tariff agreement could potentially reduce costs and ease trade barriers for European cosmetics exporters entering the U.S. market. While it aims to make transatlantic trade more economically favorable, industry experts caution that regulatory alignment and compliance issues—such as differing ingredient restrictions, labeling requirements, and testing protocols between the U.S. and EU—remain significant factors influencing market access and requiring continued vigilance from companies.

Q4: Why is there increased scrutiny on influencer marketing in the cosmetics industry? A4: Regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are increasing scrutiny on influencer marketing to ensure transparency and prevent deceptive advertising. The FTC's Endorsement Guides require clear and conspicuous disclosure of any "material connection" (e.g., payment, free products) between an influencer and a brand. Cases like Dr. Squatch highlight the need for brands to ensure their influencers properly disclose paid partnerships to maintain consumer trust and avoid legal penalties.

Q5: What are the legal risks associated with marketing "vegan collagen" products? A5: The legal risks associated with marketing "vegan collagen" products primarily stem from potential misleading claims. True collagen is an animal protein; "vegan collagen" products often contain plant-based ingredients that stimulate the body's collagen production or offer similar benefits. Brands face litigation if their marketing implies the product contains actual animal-derived collagen or if efficacy claims are not scientifically substantiated. Clear, accurate labeling that explains the product's function (e.g., "collagen-boosting") is crucial to mitigate these risks.

Q6: What is the significance of mandated textured hair training in cosmetology schools? A6: Mandating textured hair training in cosmetology schools in states like Washington, Vermont, and Maine is a significant step towards inclusivity and specialized education in the beauty industry. It addresses a historical gap in curricula that often overlooked textured hair care, ensuring future beauty professionals are equipped to serve diverse hair types. This initiative aims to improve service quality for individuals with wavy, curly, coily, and kinky hair, fostering a more inclusive and accessible beauty industry.

Q7: How is the FTC enforcing 'Made in USA' claims for cosmetics? A7: The FTC is intensifying enforcement of 'Made in USA' claims, requiring that "all or virtually all" of a product must be made in the United States for such a label to be used. This means significant parts and processing must originate domestically. The heightened scrutiny aims to prevent consumer deception, especially during periods of patriotic marketing. Brands must conduct thorough supply chain due diligence and be prepared to substantiate their claims to avoid fines and other penalties.

Q8: What impact will California's SB 54 have on the beauty industry's packaging? A8: California's SB 54, the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, will significantly impact the beauty industry by mandating that all packaging be recyclable or compostable by 2032 and requiring a 25% reduction in plastic packaging. It introduces Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), making brands responsible for funding the end-of-life management of their packaging. This will necessitate major shifts in packaging design towards mono-materials, increased use of post-consumer recycled content, and investment in recycling infrastructure.

Table of Contents